Revue Française de la recherche
en viandes et produits carnés

ISSN  2555-8560

 A la une ...


 
 

 

DERNIERS ARTICLES PARUS

Abstracts - Nutrition

Currently, some consumers are reducing or even eliminating their consumption of red meat for environmental, ethical, or financial reasons. Beyond the well-established nutritional benefits of red meat, particularly in terms of protein quality and micronutrient content, this study aimed to assess the influence of its presence in a complete couscous-type meal on the overall nutritional quality of the meal. In vivo digestibility measurements were used to collect data on the bioavailability of nutrients in meals with and without meat, highlighting the importance of meat products in meeting nutritional needs depending on the type of meal.

Results from observational studies suggest associations of red meat intake with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) have not clearly demonstrated a link between red meat consumption and CVD risk factors. Further, the specific effects of beef, the most consumed red meat in the United States, have not been extensively investigated. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials data evaluating the effects of minimally or un- processed beef intake on CVD risk factors in adults. A search of the literature was conducted using PubMed and CENTRAL databases. Randomized Controlled Trials in adults that provided diets with fresh or minimally processed beef were included. Data were extracted, and pooled estimates from random-effects models were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) between the beef intervention and comparator intervention with less or no beef. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. Twenty relevant Randomized Controlled Trials that met the criteria were included. Beef intake did not impact blood pressure or most lipoprotein-related variables, including total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, non–HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A or B, and VLDL-cholesterol. Beef consumption had a small but significant effect on LDL-cholesterol, corresponding to ~2.7 mg/dL higher LDL-cholesterol in diets containing more beef than that in low-beef or -o beef comparator diets. Sensitivity analyses show this effect was lost when 1 influential study was removed. Daily unprocessed beef intake does not significantly affect most blood lipids, apolipoproteins, or blood pressures, except for a small increase in LDL-cholesterol compared with diets with less or no beef. Thus, there may be other factors influencing the association of red meat and beef on CVD risk that deserve further investigation.
This study was registered at INPLASY as 202420013.

In view of the health concerns associated with red meat consumption, notably the haem iron and lipoperoxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids involved in the development of certain cancers, this article explores strategies for improving the nutritional quality of beef. Grass-fed farming, with its wealth of natural antioxidants (vitamins E, beta-carotenes, polyphenols), is proving to be an effective solution for enriching meat in polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3) while improving its stability and preservation. The article details the role of antioxidants in human health, in protecting muscle lipids and proteins, and in maintaining the visual appeal of meat. The importance of animal welfare in reducing oxidative stress is also discussed, along with other levers available in livestock farming, including diversified feed, nutritional supplements and rational grazing practices. These approaches all converge towards healthier, more sustainable meat production that meets society's expectations.

The prevalence rate of multiple chronic diseases among the elderly is relatively high, posing a risk to their health and also imposing a financial burden on them. Optimal dietary patterns have positive effects on multiple chronic diseases. This study aimed to identify dietary patterns associated with multiple chronic diseases in older adults. Dietary intake was assessed through two non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls. The presence of multiple chronic diseases was assessed based on the existence of dyslipidemia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, sleep disorders, diabetes, moderate or severe depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairment, with two or more of these conditions being considered. Three dietary patterns and three types of multiple chronic diseases were identified. Individuals following a diet rich in legumes, meat, vegetables and fruits (HLMVF dietary pattern) were 59% less likely to have the cardiometabolic cognitive impairment comorbidity (CCC) than those following a diet rich in milk and eggs but with low grain intake (HME-LG) and 66% less likely to have the especially sleep disorders comorbidity (ESC) than those following a diet rich in grains but lacking milk and eggs (HG-LME). The HLMVF dietary pattern may serve as a healthy dietary pattern to reduce the incidence of multiple chronic diseases and should be promoted among the older adult population.

This article is a synthesis of session 3 of the FAO Global Conference on Sustainable Livestock Transformation held in Rome in September 2023. The aim was to engage in a dialogue on innovations and pathways to efficiently produce more nutritious, safe and accessible animal-derived food with a reduced environmental footprint, and to foster dynamic and diversified local livestock systems more resilient to economic shocks and climate-related disruptions. This article is a translation of the conference session, which focused particularly on meat and the theme of “better nutrition”. Topics covered included: “Animal source food for human nutrition and health”; “World Health Organisation guidelines and consumption of animal source food”; “The drivers of supply and demand for terrestrial animal source foods”; “ensuring the safety of animal source foods”; and “cell-based food: promises and reality”.

Shifting towards a more plant-based diet, as promoted in Western countries, will reduce the animal protein contribution to total proteins. Such a reduction may not only impair protein adequacy, but also the adequacy in other nutrients. Using dietary data from a French, cross-sectional, representative survey, we determined for five French subpopulations (namely 1) women < 50 y; 2) women 50–64 y; 3) women ≥ 65 y; 4) men < 65 y; and 5) men ≥ 65 y), the minimum total protein level and the minimum animal protein contribution to total proteins that are compatible with the fulfilment of all nonprotein nutrient-based recommendations. For each subpopulation, linear programming optimization was used to assess the minimum protein level (model set #1) and the minimum animal protein contribution to total proteins (model set #2) compatible with the fulfilment of all nutrient-based recommendations (except proteins, for which levels were analysed as outputs). Total diet costs were not allowed to increase. Eating habits were considered in model set #2 only. The minimum amount of protein that was theoretically compatible with the fulfilment of nutrient-based recommendations (model set #1) was below the minimum recommended protein intake for all subpopulations except women < 50 y. In model set #2, for women and men ≥ 65 y, decreasing animal protein contributions to total proteins below 55% and 60%, respectively, led to protein levels below recommended levels. For the other subpopulations (women < 50 y, women 50–64 y, and men < 65 y), the lowest animal protein contributions to total proteins compatible with a nutritionally adequate diet (including protein adequacy) were 55%, 50%, and 45%, respectively.

Load More

Abonnez-vous !

Recevez notre Newsletter chaque trimestre. Vous êtes actuellement 4419 abonnés. VERIFIEZ DANS LES SPAMS ET ENREGISTRER L'EXPEDITEUR DANS VOTRE CARNET D'ADRESSES

Edito

La science pour sortir de la crise

L’épidémie de dermatose nodulaire bovine (DNC) est venue aggraver ces dernières semaines la crise profonde traversée par la filière bovine française, marquée par une baisse régulière des cheptels et des abattages depuis dix ans. Quelques jours avant le lancement par la ministre de l’Agriculture Annie Genevard d’une série de conférences sur la souveraineté alimentaire de la France visant à dégager une "stratégie agricole" sur 10 ans, l’ensemble des familles de l’interprofession bovine et ovine ont présenté dix mesures "prioritaires et urgentes" pour freiner la baisse du cheptel de ruminants français et préserver la souveraineté et l’indépendance alimentaire de la France. Parmi les orientations préconisées, figurent des mesures économiques comme le refus d’accords de libre-échanges "inéquitables", le renforcement des soutiens aux filières ruminants, "notamment les aides de la PAC" ou encore le renforcement de la présence de la viande française en restauration collective ; d’autres sont plus techniques et réglementaires comme la dématérialisation des documents d’identification, la définition d’un affichage environnemental des produits alimentaires "juste et cohérent" ou la reconnaissance de la place de la viande "dans l’équilibre alimentaire".
Dans ce débat crucial engagé par les professionnels avec les pouvoirs publics et l’opinion sur la place de l’élevage et de la viande bovine français au sein de la société, la science et la recherche ont bien évidemment leur mot à dire. C’est ce que montrent les quatre articles proposés dans ce numéro spécial de Viandes&Produits Carnés, tous issus d’interventions prononcées lors des matinales de la Recherche d’Interbev en mars dernier.
Une étude menée par Ceresco pour l’interprofession, basée sur les projections de l’Institut de l’Élevage et dont nous publions une synthèse, permet ainsi de mesurer l’enjeu économique et social sous-jacent à la crise actuelle. La contraction de l’offre annoncée à l’horizon 2030 menacerait ainsi 37 000 emplois directs et indirects, principalement dans les zones rurales (Massif Central, Ouest) et entrainerait -entre autres désagréments- une perte de biodiversité considérable.
Deux autres articles proposés ici éclairent également d’un jour nouveau la question controversée de l’impact de l’élevage et de la production de viande sur l’environnement, mais aussi sur ses contributions. Le premier souligne que la méthode d’analyse du cycle de vie (ACV), la plus fréquemment utilisée dans ce domaine, "peut masquer les effets bénéfiques des systèmes de production, et notamment ceux des systèmes ruminants les plus herbagers", à la différence de la méthode d’’évaluation des services écosystémique (SE). Le second article évoque, pour sa part, les perspectives offertes par les travaux du programme Méthane 2030 en matière de réduction des émissions de GES en élevage et donc de leur empreinte carbone.
Enfin, un dernier article, s’appuyant sur des mesures de digestibilité in vivo, apporte une contribution importante à la question, elle-aussi très débattue, de la place de la viande au sein des régimes alimentaires. Les données qui ont été acquises sur la biodisponibilité des nutriments de repas avec ou sans viande a ainsi permis de mettre en évidence l’intérêt des produits carnés dans la couverture des besoins nutritionnels en fonction de la typologie des repas.
Il est donc important dans ces périodes de crise de s’appuyer sur la science pour analyser objectivement et complètement les différents arguments avancés par les uns et les autres. La science doit non seulement être rigoureuse mais aussi transparente et collaborative. A cet égard, l’Association Française de Zootechnie vous invite le 6 janvier à un webinaire intitulé "Collaborations internationales de la France en sciences animales". Inscription sur ce lien
L’équipe de Viandes&Produits Carnés vous souhaite donc une bonne lecture et, par avance, de bonnes fêtes de fin d’année.

Jean-François HOCQUETTE et Bruno CARLHIAN